QUICK NOTES ON THE PALIN PERORATION:
Missed most of the speech last night as I was dragging my decrepit carcass up and down the hardwood in the inaugural game of our autumnal hoops session, but, upon staggering back to the lair after post-hoop beers, I caught most of it on TiVo,
In a word: Wow.
That GILF is a pit bull with lipstick. Not to mention aplomb, beauty and--most dangerous of all--likability. She also-and this is not to be underestimated in our culture of deep human values-- has a very good-looking family. Even the little Down's Syndrome baby was the cutest Down's Syndrome baby you'll ever see. Look for her to win the Special Olympics beauty pageant or something...and help her mom win the special needs vote in a landslide. In fact, this will be the first time the Republicans will appeal equally to special needs families and special interest groups.
She spoke in the kind of un-rushed, poised, truly communicative manner that I felt was missing from, say, Gore's delivery. And there was a scary little crazy gleam in her eye that reminded me of McCain.
Make no mistake: The Democrats have a real challenge here--as they cannot reciprocate the kind of smilingly below the belt character eviscerations that she was delivering without falling into the trap of perceived sexism and condescension. This is an asymmetry that is not to be underestimated and that really works in the Republicans' favor. The VP debate will be huge and Biden will have to be extremely disciplined to stay on message about change (not about experience) and to keep the attack on McCain, not Palin.
All of this said: While she certainly fired up the family values small-town, big-business, anti-abortion, pro-gun control, pro-death penalty, pro-fessional wrestling base, I am not sure she was very persuasive to independent women voters. I trust that they will think that, yes, she was very impressive in a certain way and a credit to the competence of women everywhere, but also very alien and negative and scary as well. Critically. the Republican convention has simply been a litany of attacks and a celebration of McCain's biography (which, I guess, is supposed to read as character). Ironically, for a campaign that has consistently mocked Obama for big empty promises, they have not put forth a single concrete policy proposal.
I see a there's a bump for McCain on intrade this morning (up from 38% to 42% likely to win.)
Overall: I'm not too worried. But we are facing a pretty formidable, nasty adversary and we can't be smug. Time to fight back. Hard. But smart.

6 Comments:
speechless - i refused to tune in - if i want to watch american idol - i will watch american idol - like ability??? if what society wants is a den mother / father - than mcbush / and monica lewinsky's older sister sarah palin are their ticket. i am flabbergasted
what did palin say? nothing - you can use your family as a selling point and than say they are off limits. i am waiting for mcbush to say "punked" ya!!
the one good thing - and again i am not a hillary supporter- even though we share the same gender however the republicans have just handed hillary her legacy - the question is - will she make an appearance friday? deflate their so called bounce?
did obama get more funding during the dnc or the rnc?
david brooks - he started showing his neo conservatism - has he gotten the flu as well. for the past several months he had written great pieces neutral
9:12 AM
I agree on the subtle and unfortunate metamorphosis of David Brooks from a neutral, smart voice of reason into something less laudable.
As for Palin: I just think it's important to acknowledge the strengths and appeals of your opponents in order to defeat them. It would be a mistake to deny the fact that., for many, many people in our (admittedly, less than ideal) electorate, she came across as very charismatic. To the rest of us, she also came across as a bit crazy.
Happily, I don't think her appeal reaches far beyond the hard core Republican base--and will not help win over undecided voters in the key states that will determine this election. (Ohio., PA, Virginia, Montana, Nevada, etc.)
9:26 AM
my rejection of mccain/palin is their policies - which i strongly disagree with. however when "they" use sexism as their tag line - it moves me over the edge.
i do think it is great that she has this opportunity and i do believe she knows her strengths and weakness, as does mccain.
however when the current climate (no reference to gore) in this country is what is - i look at this as a big distraction - and society wanting everything wrapped up in a pretty box. this country right now is not too pretty after these past 8 - 12 years.
10:50 AM
i think you are missing the main point on palin; she energizes the wingnut base but the moderates and independents are apparently, and justifiably, turned off by her. she will not draw in disgruntled clinton supporters, and while she may draw in a few redneck voters who like the idea of a VILF, the math for mccain will not be there if he cannot attract moderates and independents.
by picking palin, he went all in on the wingnuts, and he will lose.
1:30 PM
Hi true dat. I don't think anything I said contradicts anything that you are saying. I am simply cautioning against overconfidence and the potentially pernicious consequences of a strategic slip-up that could alienate the Hillary women.
1:34 PM
i know you are both correct - however i did not want to admit to myself that people even the republicians could believe what was being delivered.
2:23 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home